Educational Philosophy
Below is the first draft of the latest incarnation of my educational philosophy. I encourage and appreciate your thoughts:
Dewey writes that, "education is a social process. Education is growth. Education is, not a preparation for life; education is life itself". In my view the primary objective of education is to enrich lives by preparing students for empowered participation in the conversations and decisions of the local community, the greater society and in an increasingly global and interconnected world. I believe students already posses an essential and innate ability to make meaning from their experiences. Teachers, however, play a critical role in how students develop and hone those abilities.
To prepare our students to those ends, I create learning opportunities that meet the essential goal of education. These opportunities are centered around developing, encouraging and promoting literacy. Regardless of context educational or otherwise, the ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate, compute and use printed, written and electronic materials, is tantamount to achieving the ends of education. I believe that the keys to unlocking the physical, emotional, economic and creative doors of potential for each and every one of my students are best obtained in a variety of literary pursuits.
I am driven to design instruction with an interactive approach that reflects the ongoing interactive discussions that take place in our communities. I incorporate methods such as Think-Pair-Share, Cooperative Learning, Structured Academic controversy and Jigsaw into my lesson plans. With this type of instruction learning can only take place in a warm, safe, honest and communicative classroom community where both teacher and learner take responsibility for managing their personal conduct.
I have a strong interest in the use of technology to transform literacy. When applied with the same rigor that goes into instructional design, technology will transform our relationships with the community, greater society and our interconnected global world. Web 2.0 or new media technologies decentralize media production away from a privileged elite and give the power of multimedia storytelling to our students. Modern digital tools make it easy and affordable for classrooms to produce media rich compositions. I am influenced by the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework and a social constructivist approach to technology integration. This theoretical tilt lends itself to promoting literacy across a variety of media and across all content areas.
Paulo Friere notes, "The future is something to be constructed through trial and error rather than an inexorable vice that determines all our actions." I believe, literacy or the construction of meaning is the tool that prepares our students for the world they are negotiating to inherit. Our future will be determined through our students ability to communicate the meanings they gather from their lived experience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Great stuff Dana!
This is packed with thought-provoking ideas. I like that you went beyond the abstract ideas and actually mentioned methods you incorporate.
Two questions that come to mind:
1) When you say, With this type of instruction learning can only take place in a warm, safe, honest and communicative classroom community where both teacher and learner take responsibility for managing their personal conduct.
I'm left wondering what you do to create that environment? (I'm sure you do things, it just seems to me that such an environment needs to be fostered by a teacher or it isn't always the natural course a group of students would take.)
2. I have no idea what 'the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework' is? (Would love to find out if you could please point the way!)
Thanks for sharing, I really like the quotes you chose as well!
~Dave.
Hi Dave -
Thanks for your comment. I can always rely on you to give me something to think about
The short answer to both of your questions is: I hope you ask me that at the interview. The long answers:
1) The classroom community I described comes about by following the guidelines of Johnson and Johnson cooperative group learning. The key is to create positive interdependence - linking students together so one cannot succeed unless all group members succeed. within and between groups using a variety of activities. Johnson and Johnson go into five other elements of cooperation that you can read about here http://www.co-operation.org/pages/cl.html
2) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework or TPCK (pronounced T-Pack). Is a systematic way of thinking about technology integration. Basically it involves playing off the interplay of the combination of all the different types of knowledge in the the first part of the TPCK acronym. Good teaching is usually thought of as occurring where content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge combine i.e. am does knowing which methods work with which content and why. TPCK just adds technology, which types of technology will transform which types of content and which methods and why. You can read more about TPCK at http://www.tpack.org/tpck/index.php?title=Main_Page
Post a Comment